The R&L Nikkor Tables

David Ruether's and Grover Larkins' Subjective Evaluations of Nikon Lenses

The Ratings

Wides & Normals

Telephoto Lenses

Zoom Lenses

Teleconverters

Why this compilation? When using Nikon lens evaluations on the Web, I found myself going back and forth continuously between the impressive lists compiled by David Ruether and Grover Larkins. Combination tables are available, but I didn't want to lose David's invaluable comments on individual lenses. Hence, my own synthesis table which is on the Web by the kind permission of the original main author. Click the links above for the various sections of the R&L Nikkor tables. Click the links below for the original material by either R or L, which does include a limited selection of brands other than Nikon. David Ruether on lenses: "Poor lenses can be used to make fine photographs, but how much more fun is it to use good lenses and not need to find ways around their shortcomings".

Here's looking at you, David!

Photographer David Ruether does architectural, college-catalogue, portrait, publicity, stock, aerial, and wedding photography - anything on-location. His career had a few halting beginnings, starting with using an Argus 75 snapshooter, a little B&W processing in high school, followed by experimenting with a little slide shooting while in architecture schools, and an attempt to document a US cross-country trip. A bit of architectural and other types of photography followed, and he soon gave up architecture for photography. Before long, he had shown work in many museums, and a couple of magazine articles were published on his photography. A few museums bought prints, and one published a small book of his photographs. He taught photography part time at an upstate NY women's college, and also was a commercial photographer (which he calls: "a self-unemployed member of the leisure-poor class"). He gave it all up for several years while exploring audio interests, but then returned to photography about a dozen years ago.
Grover Larkins on lenses: "I'm getting quite a few questions pertaining to long lenses and nature photography glass in particular (...) Here are some lens rankings based upon personal experiences of several closely allied Pro Photographers".

David Ruether's Subjective Lens Evaluations

Grover Larkins'
Original Table

Klaus Schroiff's Photozone

Roland Vink's Nikon lens summary

The Verwoerd Family
Research Project


The Ratings Explained

Back to the top

Rating by GL is Optical/Mechanical, each on a scale of 0-5. A rating of above 4 is considered to be "Pro Quality".

GL's Optical Ratings -

GL's Mechanical Ratings -

Rating by DR may be compared with GL's marks for optical performance; he deals with some mechanical aspects in his notes on particular lenses. Although his scale runs from 0-7, DR explains that the marks 0,1,6 and 7 are in fact not used.

DR's Optical Ratings -


Wides & normals

Back to the top

Wides & normals

GL

DR

Comments by DR, unless otherwise noted

6mm f5.6

--

4

1 sample; no TTL viewing, no accurate v.f., fits only on bodies with mirror lock-up, 220 degree circular image (the widest fisheye-perspective lens made for 35mm)
6mm f2.8

--

--

very large, heavy, and expensive; 220 degree circular image (the widest fisheye-perspective lens made for 35 mm)
7.5mm f5.6

--

4

1 sample; no TTL viewing (though the separate VF is remarkably accurate; fits only on bodies with mirror lock-up; 180 degree circular image
8mm f8

--

--

first 35mm version of 180 degree circular fisheye; no TTL viewing; no accurate VF (had only a centering finder); fits only on bodies with a mirror lock-up
8mm f2.8

--

4.4

2 samples; 180 degree circular image, equally good in B & W and color; not great at wide stops, excellent sharpness to edge of coverage by f11; physically big and heavy, works well with TC14A at f11-16
10mm f5.6 OP

--

--

orthographic projection, no TTL viewing, no accurate VF (the fiseye finder is designed for the 7.5mm lens and is inaccurate in perspective; fits only on bodies with mirror lock-up; 180 degree circular image
13mm f5.6

--

--

large, heavy, very expensive; 118 degrees diagonal coverage, the widest rectangular-perspective lens made for 35mm SLRs
15mm f5.6

--

3~4.2

several samples, some sample variation; very low linear distortion, even center to corner performance, very even illumination (in common with all the Nikkor wides except the 18mm MF's, the 21mm, and the 35mm f2 MF at wide stops); slightly yellow color cast compared with other Nikkors, best at f11-16, need to open 1/2 stop from meter reading, corners improve slightly in B & W using yellow, orange, or red filter
15mm f3.5

--

4

2 samples; poor corner performance in B & W, good in color
16mm f3.5

--

5

3 samples; wonderful lens, can be used wide open, works very well w. TC14A by f5.6 for a great people super-wide; 170 degree diagonal coverage; full frame fisheye perspective
16mm f2.8

--

3.5~4.4

3 samples; works very well with TC14A by f5.6, 180 degree full frame fisheye persspective; best samples at best stops equal performance of the f3.5 (f3.5 version is better at wide stops) AF optics are the same
18mm f4

--

3

2 samples; poor edges and corners even stopped down
18mm f3.5

--

4.5

2 samples; better in color than B & W; good wide stop color performance (though with noticeable corner illumination roll-off at wide stops)
18mm f2.8 AF

--

--

--
19mm f2.8 Micro

--

--

one of four high-magnification micro lenses, with manual diaphragm, no focus, and Royal Screw thread mount (15X - 40X)
20mm f8

5/5

--

fisheye, 153 degrees coverage, part pf limited-offering "Fun Lens Set", fixed focus and aperture
20mm f4

--

3.4

2 samples; useable when well stopped down
20mm f3.5 non-AI

--

3.5~4

2 samples; 72mm filter version; good when well stopped down
20mm f3.5

--

3~3.5

several samples; 52mm filter version; some sample variation; useable when well stopped down for distant subjects; good nearly wide open focussed closer than about 15' (rating 4.4)
20mm f2.8

5/5

4.3~4.8

4 samples; the best samples have excellent performance to the corners by f5.6, the worst by f8; relatively low linear distortion; AF optics are the same.
21mm f4

--

4

3 samples; no TTL viewing (though the separate VF is remarkably accurate); no linear distortion; very even center to corner sharpness; some tendency to flare; some illumination roll-off toward the edges and corners; extremely compact when mounted on the camera; will fit only the F and F2 bodies (the lens should not rotate while being mounted and only the F and F2 bodies have the necessary tab to prevent rotation)
24mm f2.8 non-AI

--

4

2 samples
24mm f2.8 AI

4.5/5

4.2~4.6

many samples; needs shade; some samples are not quite as crisp at the edges and corners near infinity focus as the slightly wider 20mm f2.8; AF optics are the same
24mm f2

--

4.2

2 samples; low contrast at wide stops
28mm f4 PC

--

4.6

3 samples; better off-axis performance than most 28mm f3.5 PC samples (all of the Nikkor PC lenses will illuminate almost the complete frame, even with the most extreme movement - beyond the recommended shift limit - but all require f16-22 to sharpen the far edge of coverage; f11 is sufficient with this lens to sharpen the top corners of a horizontal frame with full rise applied); metering with all bodies except the F3 must be done with the lens unshifted
28mm f3.5 PC

--

4

3 samples; better wide stop performance with no shift than the 28mm f4 PC, but off axis it is generally not up to f4, even stopped down; a good sample is useable on the TC200/1 for extreme shift effects; metering with all bodies except the F3 must be done with the lens unshifted
28mm f3.5 non-AI

--

3.4

3 samples; vignettes with any filter
28mm f3.5 AI

--

4.8

4 samples; good wide open, very even center to corner performance
28mm f2.8 early

--

3.6

3 samples; unusually resistent to flare, poor corners until well stopped down
28mm f2.8 AIS

--

4.8

4 samples; good wide open short of corners
28mm f2.8 E

4.5/4

2.8~3.8

of several tried, two were good at smaller stops, the others were poor; E-series primes have plastic focus parts that wear fairly quickly and they are not multicoated; AF (non-D) optics are the same, but are multicoated
28mm f2.8 AF D

--

4.2

1 sample; CRC (Close Range Correction) added with the D, with improved edge performance
28mm f2

4.5/5

4~4.6

many samples; some sample variation; often not as good at wide stops as the f2.8 AIS 28mm - but often better than the f2.8 AIS by 5.6
28mm f1.4 AF

--

--

see review article http://www.ferrario.com/ruether/articles.html#28f1.4
35mm f4.5 Micro

--

5

1 sample; one of four high-magnification micro lenses, with manual diaphragm and no focus - with Royal Screw thread mount (8X - 20X)
35mm f3.5 PC

--

3.5

1 sample; poor off-axis performance; metering with all bodies except the F3 must be done with the lens unshifted
35mm f2.8 PC non-AI early

--

4.2

3 samples; non-AI PC's generally fit AI cameras, though they nudge the coupling tab a bit (check the tab position after the lens is mounted to be sure the tab was not moved during mounting or exposures will be inaccurate); metering with all bodies except the F3 must be done with the lens unshifted
35mm f2.8 PC AIS latest

--

5

3 samples; excellent to the corners wide open shifted up to about 3mm (the lens will illuminate the complete frame even with the most extreme movement - beyond the recommended shift limit - but requires f16-22 to sharpen the top far edge of coverage; f8 is sufficient to sharpen the top corners of a horizontal frame with full rise applied); it has the best performance of all the Nikkor 35's at f2.8; good on TC14A with about 5mm or less shift (effectively 7mm) when not stopped down beyond about f5.6; metering with all bodies except the F3 must be done with the lens unshifted
35mm f2.8 non-AI

--

3.8

1 sample
35mm f2.8 AI

--

3.8~4

 2 samples; this version has five elements; an earlier version has six elements (untried); the earlier 1975 six lens non-AI version is known as "type 4", from nr. 350001 on, and the 1978 six lens AI "type 5" version starts at nr. 773111 (LV)
35mm f2.5 E

3/4

4

 3 samples; very small and light; the small front element makes effective shading easy
35mm f2

3.5/4

3.5~4.8

many samples; some sample variation; most AIS are about 4.5, with one 4.8; many pre-AI samples drop to the 3.5-4 range and the non-multicoated ones flare easily with backlight; the best are sharp wide open short of the far cormers, though all show noticeable illumination fall off at wide apertures
35mm f2 AF

5/4

4.3

2 samples; small front element makes effective shading easy
35mm f1.4

5/5

4.2~4.6

4 samples; good sharpness wide open at middle distances, reasonably good contrast and reasonably even illumination wide open
45mm f2.8 GN

--

4

1 sample; aperture can vary with distance setting for use with manual flashes (guide number is set on lens); excellent performance stopped down, though not as good as the 50's at wide stops
45mm f2.8 P

--

--

optics probably the same as GN but multicoated, MF but with AF electronics; way overpriced!
50mm f2

--

4.6

several samples; very even center to corner performance at all stops; good wide open
50mm f1.8 AIS metal

4/5

4.8

many samples; very even center to corner performance at all stops; good wide open
50mm f1.8 E, plastic AIS, compact metal AIS

4/4

3.8~4.6

many samples; very small and light; small front element makes effective shading easy; usually good wide open, no linear distortion; the E is not multicoated, but other versions versions are; AF optics is the same, is multicoated, and has a longer barrel.
50mm f1.4 non-AI

--

4~4.2

many samples; low contrast wide open, though excellent at middle and smaller stops; wide stops can be sharpened with a red filter in B & W, though illumination fall-off shows until about f4
50mm f1.4 AIS

4.5/5

4.6

many samples; very good by f2, short of corners; the AI version may be slightly different optically; AF optics are the same
50mm f1.2

--

4~5

several samples; 5 at 4 to 15 feet or so, otherwise 4-4.4; excellent center to corners wide open near optimum focus distance, with declining quality at edges as infinity focus is approached; showes severe coma at infinity wide open with point light sources near the frame edges
55mm f4 UV

--

--

may exist only as prototype
55mm f3.5 Micro

5/5

3.5~5

many samples; 4.8 close, 3.8-4.5 near infinity; earliest version had preset diaphragm; the next version had an auto diaphragm that opened with closer focus to compensate for extension exposure loss; the later version did not have the compensating diaphragm; goes to 1:2
55mm f2.8 Micro

4.5/4.5 AF 4.5/4

4~5

many samples; 5 at infinity, 4 close; the MF version tends to acquire oil on the diaphragm leaves; goes to 1:2; AF has the same optics but goes to 1:1
55mm f1.2

3/5

3.5

3 samples; reasonably good at mid distances (DR); a true dog (GL)
55mm f1.2 CRT

--

4.8

3 samples; Leica thread, no focus, f11 minimum aperture, 8-elements in 6-groups - optimised for 363mm focus distance, wondeful reversed on tubes/bellows around 5X
58mm f1.4 non-AI

--

--

first "speed" lens for the Nikon F (1959)
58mm f1.2 Noct

5/5

3.8

1 sample, possibly defective; wide stops poor, though performance excellent by f5.6
60mm f2.8 Micro AF

5/4

3.5~5.2

2 samples; poor (3.5) at infinity at corners at wide to mid stops, though excellent by f11 - 5.2 close; the best of the macro lenses in macro range, works very well with converters in macro range; goes to 1:1
65mm f4.5 Micro

--

--

one of four high-magnification micro lenses, with manual diaphragm, no focus; 39mm thread mount (3.5X - 10X)

Teles

Back to the top

Telephoto lenses

GL

DR

Comments by DR, unless otherwise noted

80mm f4.5 AF

--

--

very early AF lens, with internal AF mechanism, may exist only as prototype
80mm f2.8 AF

--

--

early AF lens for F3AF (1983); has a good reputation
85mm f2.8 T/S Micro

--

--

tilt-shift macro lens, MF, with push-button diapragm stop-down; goes to 1:2
85mm f2

--

4.8

several samples; performance declines at wide stops near minimum focus
85mm f1.8 non-AI

--

4.8

2 samples; very good wide open, flares easily with backlight in non-multicoated samples
85mm f1.8 AF

5/4

4.8

1 sample; slightly better in corners wide open near minimum focus distance than near infinity; good wide stop close focus performance
85mm f1.4

5/5

4.8

4 samples; good wide open, floating element maintains good performance down to minimum focus distance
85mm f1.4 AF

--

--

-- 
90mm f4.8 Soft-Focus

--

--

part of limited-offering "Fun Lens Set"; fixed aperture; converts to 120mm f4.5 macro
100mm f2.8 E

--

4.8

3 samples; light and compact
105mm f4.5 UV

--

--

lens designed to pass ultraviolet
105mm f4 preset

--

--

normal focus range; same optics (3/3) as the 105mm f4 from the rangefinder era (LV)
105mm f4 Micro

4.5/5

3.5

3 samples; not great at wide stops, others report much better results with this lens than I found; goes to 1:2; the 105mm short mount version has the same optics
105mm f2.8 MF Micro

4/5

4.4~5

2 samples; 5 at infinity, 4.4 close; possibly the best center to corner performance at infinity at 2.8 of all lenses I have tried; goes to 1:2 (other unusually well performing lenses at infinity at 2.8 are the 180mm AF, 135mm f2 MF, later 105mm f2.5, 100mm f2.8, and the latest version 35mm 2.8 PC)
105mm f2.8 Micro AF

5/5

4~4.5

3 samples; 4-4.5 at infinity, 4.8 close; too difficult to focus manually near infinity - focus is too fast, alignment problems noted in two samples near infinity; goes to 1:1
105mm f2.5 early

--

4

several samples; small rear element (early non-AI with silver front)
105mm f2.5 later

--

4.8

several samples; performance declines at wide stops near minimum focus (DR); from nr.50 0001 on; a great portrait lens; the very reason I bought my Nikon (LV)
105mm f2 DC AF

--

--

--
105mm f1.8

--

4.5~4.6

many samples; performance wider than about f4 can be good, though disappointing compared with other Nikkors in this range  
120mm f6.3 Micro

--

--

one of four high-magnification micro lenses, with manual diaphragm and no focus - with 39mm thread mount (1/3X - 4X on 35mm, 1X - 4X on 4x5)
120mm f4.5 Macro

--

--

part of limited-offering "Fun Lens Set", fixed aperture, only two fixed magnification ratios, converts to 90mm f4.8 soft-focus
120mm f4 Medical

--

--

needs power pack for built-in ring flash
135mm f4 short mount

--

--

--
135mm f3.5

--

4.5

2 samples 
135mm f2.8 non-AI

--

4.5

3 samples 
135mm f2.8 compact

--

4.8

4 samples; performance declines at wide stops near minimum focus
135mm f2.8 E

--

4.5

2 samples 
135mm f2

--

3~4.9

3 samples; 4.9 beyond about 10', 3 at minimum focus; very sharp center to corner at f2 at mid to long distances with some very slight field curvature barely noticeable at wide stops near infinity, performance is poor near minimum focus at wide apertures
135mm f2 DC AF

--

--

-- 
180mm f2.8 non-ED

--

4.6

1 sample 
180mm f2.8 ED

4.8/5

4.8

1 sample 
180mm f2.8 EDIF AF

5/5

5.2

1 sample; this lens is wonderful at all stops, center-to-corner, all distances (even on a short tube) (DR); GL rates old, pre 1988 version 5/4 (LV)
180mm f2.5 preset

--

--

adapted from RF to SLR
200mm f5.6 Medical

--

--

needs power pack for built-in ring flash
200mm f4 older

--

4.2

several samples
200mm f4 compact

--

4.5

several samples; can be great as a macro lens; the best auto-diapragm lens for about 3X that I have used (DR); from nr.670 003 on (LV)
200mm f4 IF Micro

--

4

2 samples; slight sample variation, (one nice at infinity, but less so close, the other the reverse), goes to 1:2
200mm f4 EDIF Micro AF

--

--

1 sample; rather large, heavy and expensive macro lens with fine infinity-focus performance by f8 (but not much wider), goes to 1:1; see article on this lens: http://www.ferrario.com/ruether/articles.html#70-180
200mm f3.5 EDIF AF

--

--

early AF lens for F3AF (has a good reputation)
200mm f2 EDIF

4.5/5

--

all of the fast EDIF Nikkors have good reputations
300mm f4.5

3/4.5

3.6~4.2

several samples; some variation, often not wonderful at wider stops, not good with converters; fairly compact and light
300mm f4.5 ED non-IF

--

4.8

1 sample; very good with converters; fairly compact and light
300mm f4.5 EDIF

4.8/5

4~4.8

3 samples; good on tubes but not good with converters; fairly compact and light
300mm f4 EDIF AF

5/5

4.8

2 samples; good with converters (especially TC14/14B/14C), compact and light compared with the f2.8 versions
300mm f4 EDIF AF S

--

5

1 sample; large for a 300mm f4, but well-balanced and not heavy; equally sharp at infinity-focus and minimum-focus which may make it useful with converters and achromats (neither were tried) for macro work
300mm f2.8

--

--

-- 
300mm f2.8 EDIF

5/5

5

3 samples; excellent with converters (good even wide open on matched converters); large, heavy, and expensive, as are all long and fast teles
300mm f2.8 EDIF AF

4.8/4

--

marks by GL are for the 1st AF version (LV)
300mm f2.8 EDIF AF I

5/5

--

internal focus motor
300mm f2.8 EDIF AF S

--

--

internal focus motor
300mm f2.8 EDIF AF II

4.8/4.8

--

lighter than earlier 300mm f2.8 Nikkors 
300mm f2 EDIF

5/5

--

came with the wonderful TC14C
350mm f4.5 semi-auto

--

--

adapted from RF camera 
400mm f8

--

--

part of limited-offering "Fun Lens Set", fixed aperture, unusually comact when "telescoped", accepts 52mm filters
400mm f5.6

--

--

-- 
400mm f5.6 ED non-IF

--

--

-- 
400mm f5.6 EDIF

4.8/5

4.8

1 sample; very good with converters, fairly narrow and light (and overpriced, as are most of the big, fast teles of all brands, in my opinion...)
400mm f4.5 non-AI (ED)

--

--

came as lens head that fit a standard focusing unit common to 400mm, 600mm, 800mm, and 1200mm lenses of the time (the 400mm, 600mm, 800mm, 1200mm heads were available as either ED or non-ED)
400mm f3.5 EDIF

5/5

5

2 samples; excellent with converters (good even wide open on matched converters)
400mm f2.8 EDIF

--

--

-- 
400mm f2.8 EDIF AF I

--

--

Good lens, great boat anchor: 6kg vs 3kg for the f3.5; couldn't Nikon make the 400 f3.5 as an AF lens? (GL)
500mm f8 mirror, early

3.8/5

4

3 samples; good with TC14/14B; performs better near infinity than near minimum focus distance (4m); rate film speed 1/2 stop lower when using this lens; there is a moderate center "hot spot" (as there is with most mirrors), using the TC14/14B reduces this (DR); GL does not specify early/late version (LV)
500mm f8 mirror, late

--

3.6

2 samples; very close focus (1.5m), best performance near middle of focus range; compact and light
500mm f5 non-automatic

--

--

adapted from RF camera 
500mm f5 mirror

--

3.2

1 sample; large, surprisingly light - minimum focus 50' (15m)
500mm f4 EDIF P

5/4.5

--

MF, but contains AF electronics (DR); wimpy tripod mount (GL)
500mm f4 EDIF AF I

5/5

--

AF version is sharper wide open in the corners than the MF, but they both are quite good (GL)
600mm f5.6 non-AI (ED)

--

--

(see 400mm f4.5 notes)
600mm f5.6 EDIF

5/5

--

--
600mm f4 EDIF

5/5

--

1 sample; inconclusive results from a brief trial 
600mm f4 EDIF AF I

5/5

--

internal focus motor
600mm f4 EDIF AF S

--

--

internal focus motor 
800mm f8 non-AI (ED)

--

--

(see 400mm f4.5 notes)
800mm f8 EDIF

--

--

-- 
800mm f5.6 EDIF

--

--

-- 
1000mm f11 mirror

--

3.3

1 sample; it is very difficult to use a lens this long beyond a few hundred feet because the air qualities greatly affect the image quality; fairly light and compact for its very long focal length
1000mm f10 MTO mirror

--

3

1 sample; remarkably even illumination
1000mm f6.3 mirror

--

--

very large - minimum focus 100' (30m) 
1200mm f11 non-AI (ED)

--

--

(see 400mm f4.5 notes)
1200mm f11 EDIF

--

--

-- 
2000mm f11 mirror

--

--

very large, very heavy, very expensive

Zooms

Back to the top

Zoom lenses

GL

DR

Comments by DR, unless otherwise noted

17-35mm f2.8 AF S

--

--

--
18-35mm f3.5-4.5 AF

--

--

--
20-35mm f2.8 AF

 4.8/5

--

arguably the best wide zoom on the market, crisp and competitive with primes for sharpness and contrast (GL); not much range (DR)
24-50mm f3.3-4.5 AF

 --

--

not much range
24-85mm f2.8-4 AF

--

--

--
24-120mm f3.5-5.6 (AF)

4.5/4.5

4.4

zoom loose on early versions; great travel lens (GL); 1 sample; remarkably good performance everywhere at f11; better than most middle range FL zooms at wider stops; focusses closer than most wide range zooms; see review article: http://www.ferrario.com/ruether/articles.html#24-120
25-50mm f4

 --

4.4

several samples; vignettes slightly at closest focus at 25mm with a filter; not much range
28-45mm f4.5

 --

3.8

1 sample; slow, not much range
28-50mm f3.5

 --

4

2 samples; sharp, but has field curvature especially noticeable at the short end of the zoom range; not much range
28-70mm f3.5-4.5 AF

 --

3.8~4.6

3 samples; some sample variation
28-70mm f2.8 AF S

--

--

built-in linear-motor AF
28-80mm f3.5-5.6 AF

 --

--

there may be two optical versions; too slow at the, not very long end
28-85mm f3.5-4.5

 --

4~4.2

4 samples; AF optics are the same
28-105mm f3.5-4.5 AF

--

4

1 sample; internal focus; unusually low linear distortion, exellent center to corner sharpness uniformity (especially at the short end); not wonderful at the widest stops longer than about 50mm; poor performance in macro mode at maximum magnification (1:2); see review article: http://www.ferrario.com/ruether/articles.html#28-105
28-200mm f3.5-5.6 AF

--

3.5~4

1 sample; 4 35-105mm, 3.5 otherwise; extremely wide range in a compact package; not terrible anywhere, but not wonderful over much of its range - worst above 135mm; see review article: http://www.ferrario.com/ruether/articles.html#28-200
35-70mm f3.5 (72 filter)

 --

--

not much range ("foot-zooming" may be more useful much of the time than using a zoom with this range of FLs...)
35-70mm f3.5 (62 filter)

 --

--

unusually low distortion; not much range (has good reputation)
35-70mm f3.3-4.5

 --

3.4~4.2

many samples; easier to manually focus than most zooms, but not much range; AF optics are the same though there seems to be more sample variation with the AF
35-70mm f2.8 AF D

 --

4~4.6

2 samples; some sample variation; not much range
35-80mm f4-5.6 AF

 --

--

not much range, and too slow for this range
35-105mm f3.5-4.5

 --

3~4.5

many samples; this may be Nikon's most variable-quality lens (sample variation is generally not a problem with Nikkor lenses, except with the 35mm-to-X zooms); a good sample is excellent at all stops center to corners except near infinity near 105mm; macro is excellent above about 50mm (there is an additional focusing ring at the rear for close-focus, useable at all FLs); must be used with the short shade made for it ; AF (non-D) optics are the same
35-105mm f3.5-4.5 AF D

 --

4~4.2

3 samples 
35-135mm f3.5-4.5

 --

3.6~4

4 samples, most not wonderful at wider stops but excellent by mid stops; some sample variation; AF optics are the same
35-200mm f3.5-4.5

 --

2~2.8

2 samples; considerable sample variation; the two samples I tried performed differently and both were poor (probably defective); there is an additional focusing ring at the rear for close focus, useable at all FLs; compact
36-72mm f3.5 E

 --

4~4.4

4 samples; slightly lower contrast than is usual for Nikkor lenses, but remarkably uniform center to corner sharpness; not much range (the E zoom glass is multicoated and the barrels are mostly metal, unlike the E primes)
43-86mm f3.5

 3/4.5

2~4

3 samples; latest version is much better than earlier versions, which are very poor (Yuck! Pah! Bleah!); not much range
50-135mm f3.5

 --

4.6

4 samples; non-rotating front; good wide open, useable with converters
50-300mm f4.5

 --

--

-- 
50-300mm f4.5 ED IF

 5/5

--

An African Classic; should be done in AF (GL). So I bought a used sample, and went to Africa. A classic experience; excellent results (LV). 
70-180mm f4.5-5.6 ED Micro AF

--

4.5

1 sample; 1:3.2 at 70mm, 1:1.32 at 180mm, with slightly greater magnification available by using the 6T achromat; has some unique characteristics; see review on this lens: http://www.ferrario.com/ruether/articles.html#70-180
70-210mm f4-5.6 AF

 --

3.5~4

4 samples; corners at short end are below average for Nikkor zooms in this range; a little sample variability
70-210mm f4 E

 --

4.4

several samples; good wide open, works well on TC14A; AF optics are the same; AF focus ring at front is narrow (as with other early-style AF Nikkors)
70-300mm f4-5.6 ED AF

--

3.5~4

3 samples; very compact and light; first two samples tried were moderately defective, third was well-aligned, but not up to Nikon's usual standards for their better tele zooms
70-300mm f4-5.6 AF G

--

--

doesn't manually meter on older AF and MF bodies, no aperture ring
75-150mm f3.5 E

 5/4.5

4.8

many samples; works well on converters, is very good wide open and throughout its focus and zoom ranges
75-240mm f4.5-5.6

--

3

1 sample; cheap, light, small, and not very good - I view Nikkors like this as evidence of the "Canonization" of Nikon (the trading on a good name with junk, to make more money now at the eventual expense of the company's good reputation als a lens-maker...); until a few years ago, "Nikkor" written on a lens in any price range indicated a very high probability that the lens was at least good - but with the advent of so-so plastic AF lenses aimed at the bottom end of the market, a growing proportion of Nikkor lenses is falling into the mediocre category, alas...
75-300mm f4.5-5.6 AF

--

4~4.2

2 samples; good wide open (with good sample)
80-200mm f4.5-5.6 AF

 --

--

-- 
80-200mm f4.5 non-AI

 --

4~4.2

3 samples; earlier version is larger than later version
80-200mm f4.5

 5/5

4.3

several samples; both versions show lower overall image quality at long end than more modern Nikkor zooms in this range, but they are still very good
80-200mm f4

 --

4.5

1 sample; good wide open
80-200mm f2.8 ED

 5/5

--

larger and heavier than the AF versions
80-200mm f2.8 ED AF

 early 4.8/4

late 4.8/5

5

3 samples; performance under about 8' at 200mm declines and becomes poor at minimum focus at wide stops - otherwise this lens is wonderful even wide open, performs very well on TC14C (and almost as well on TC14B, not on TC200/1, fairly well on a modified TC20E); the length and mass help me hand hold this lens down to 1/60 at 200mm - something impossible for me with the 200mm prime or the f4 zooms; a heavy lens with no tripod socket; late AF-D version adds tripod mount and has separate very well placed zoom and focus rings; manual focus is easier with this version (much to my surprise...)
80-200mm f2.8 AF S

--

--

built-in linear-motor AF
80-400mm f4.5-5.6 VR AF

--

--

has image stabilization that works only when the lens is used on the most recent generation of Nikon bodies
85-250mm f4-4.5

 --

--

very large and heavy early zoom
85-250mm f4

 --

--

-- 
100-300mm f5.6

 --

4.2~4.5

several samples; unusually low distortion (slight barrel to 135mm, then no distortion to 300mm); good wide open, not good with converters
180-600mm f8 ED

 --

--

-- 
200-600mm f9.5-10.5

 --

--

-- 
200-600mm f9.5 ED

 --

--

-- 
200-400mm f4 ED

 5/5

--

has an excellent reputation (DR); an African Classic; should be done in AF (GL)
360-1200mm f11 ED

 --

--

-- 
1200-1700mm f5.6-8 ED

 --

--

large, heavy (16 Kg), VERY expensive (on special order only)

Teleconverters

Back to the top

Teleconverters

GL

DR

Comments by DR, unless otherwise noted; the "X's" in the rating column indicate that the performance of the converter/lens combination varies a lot; the rated converters work with virtually everything they will fit

TC14A

--

4.8

2 samples; 1.4X for short lenses that do not have rear elements recessed enough to accept the long-lens TC14s; works well with most lenses it fits that are 200mm and shorter
TC14 and TC14B

4.5/5

4.8

4 samples; 1.4X for lenses that have rear elements recessed enough to accept converters with projecting front elements (mostly long lenses); can be used with other lenses for macro macro work when using tubes on the front of the converter (TC14 is AI, TC14B is AIS)
TC14C

--

5

2 samples; 1.4X for lenses that have rear elements recessed enough to accept converters with projecting front elements (mostly long lenses); can be used with other lenses for macro macro work when using tubes on the front of the converter; this unusual converter is near perfect on some lenses, and out-performs the excellent TC14/14B on all lenses they will fit except the older 500mm f8 mirror (the 80-200mm f2.8 AF with the TC14C by f4 is as good as prime lenses, and betters the excellent 100-300mm f5.6 at similar stops); came with the Nikkor 300mm f2
TC14E

4.5/5

--

1.4X; designed for AFI/S (long) lenses, and will not fit others without modification of the converter bayonet
TC16

--

--

1.6X; designed for F3AF, adds limited focus range AF ability to MF lenses f2.8 and faster
TC16A

--

4~4.6

2 samples; 1.6X; adds limited focus range AF ability to MF lenses f2.8 and faster; does not pass AF lens electrical signals to the camera body; does not match as many lenses as the TC14A does
TC-1, TC200, TC201

--

X

4 samples; 2X for lenses that do not have rear elements recessed enough to accept the long-lens TCs; works well on some lenses, adequately on some, and poorly on some; f5.6 is the widest stop for good performance even with the best lenses on it; excellent for increasing magnification in macro work when using small stops (TC-1 is non-AI, TC200 is AI, TC201 is AIS)
TC-2, TC300, TC301

4.2/4.5

3.5~4.5

3 samples; 2X for long lenses that have rear elements recessed enough to accept converters with projecting front elements (mostly long lenses); can be used with tubes on front of converter for macro work, results are good with most lenses that it fits, except the 300mm f4.5 non-ED, and 300mm f4.5 EDIF (TC-2 is non-AI, TC300 is AI, TC301 is AIS)
TC20E

4.8/5

X

1 sample; 2X; designed for AFI/S (long) lenses, and it will not fit others without modification of the converter bayonet; works fairly well with the 80-200mm f2.8 AF (better than the TC200/1), but not well on other non I/S lenses I tried it on

Back to the top